<\/p>\n
Health Minister Mark Butler has declined the 31 insurers\u2019 proposed premium increase that could have delivered an average jump to as high as six per cent.<\/span>Credit: <\/span>Glenn Hunt<\/cite><\/p>\n Private Healthcare Australia chief executive Rachel David said the proposed premium increase reflects costs they cannot control such as hospitals requesting more funding, increased demand for insurance and the cost of medical and surgical tools.<\/p>\n \u201cThe health funds don\u2019t want to put up premiums by $1,\u201d she said. \u201cThey totally get that some people are making major sacrifices to afford health insurance and a large number of people perceive they don\u2019t have a choice because of long hospital waiting lists.<\/p>\n \u201cThe funds will do everything in their negotiations with government to keep that higher rate as low as possible.\u201d<\/p>\n The negotiations are expected to continue into the new year as Butler said he was not inclined to approve the insurers\u2019 proposed premium increases during a cost-of-living crisis when nearly 15 million Australians have private health insurance.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019ve written to every private health insurer, directing them to put forward a more reasonable figure that considers their years of record profits and the declining proportion of premiums they return to customers,\u201d Butler said.<\/p>\n This year insurers have had the highest membership rates in more than five years because of Australians\u2019 poor perception of the public health system as data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority revealed more than 45 per cent of Australians had hospital insurance in the September quarter and 55 per cent had general cover for extras such as dental, optical and physiotherapy.<\/p>\n David said insurers were determined to keep premiums low but argued that they paid some of the highest prices for generic medical devices such as replacement joints and medical sponges because of Australia\u2019s \u201cprotheses list\u201d, which mandates how much insurers pay for devices.<\/p>\n \u201cWe cannot be in a situation where the noisiest and most powerful providers like the big device companies and the medical specialists are constantly insisting that the health funds pay top dollar for everything they want, regardless of the demonstrated value or the need, and then expect the premiums to be low. They are two completely incompatible things,\u201d she said.<\/strong><\/p>\n However, the Medical Technology Association of Australia chief executive Ian Burgess argued that the claim they forced health funds to pay top dollar was \u201cdemonstrably false\u201d.<\/p>\n \u201cDespite making profits of $2.2 billion, insurers have failed to pass on these savings to consumers through lower premiums \u2026 MTAA is calling on the government to shine a spotlight on the accounting practices and questionable management fees of insurers,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Chief executive of health insurer NIB David Fitzgibbon said he respected the government knocking back their premium proposal and would continue to negotiate, but said customers will continue to face higher prices than necessary because the major medical device companies were able to set higher prices.<\/p>\n \u201cThis issue is never going to go away while health insurers are paying medical device companies directly \u2026 the solution to this constant battle is that medical devices are bundled in a payment to doctors or hospitals,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n